Matter of Interpretation / Libristo.pl
Matter of Interpretation

Kod: 04639144

Matter of Interpretation

Autor Antonin Scalia

We are all familiar with the image of the immensely clever judge who discerns the best rule of common law for the case at hand. According to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, a judge like this can maneuver through earlier ... więcej


Niedostępna

Powiadomienie o dostępności

Dodaj do schowka

Zobacz książki o podobnej tematyce

Powiadomienie o dostępności

Powiadomienie o dostępności


Akceptacja - Zgłaszając nam chęć otrzymania powiadomienia, akceptujesz warunki Regulaminu

Będziemy sprawdzać dostępność książki za Ciebie

Wpisz swój adres e-mail, aby otrzymać od nas powiadomienie,
gdy książka będzie dostępna. Proste, prawda?

Więcej informacji o Matter of Interpretation

Opis

We are all familiar with the image of the immensely clever judge who discerns the best rule of common law for the case at hand. According to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, a judge like this can maneuver through earlier cases to achieve the desired aim - 'distinguishing one prior case on his left, straight-arming another one on his right, high-stepping away from another precedent about to tackle him from the rear, until (bravo!) he reaches the goal-good law'. But is this common-law mindset, which is appropriate in its place, suitable also in statutory and constitutional interpretation? In a witty and trenchant essay, Justice Scalia answers this question with a resounding negative.In exploring the neglected art of statutory interpretation, Scalia urges that judges resist the temptation to use legislative intention and legislative history. In his view, it is incompatible with democratic government to allow the meaning of a statute to be determined by what the judges think the lawgivers meant rather than by what the legislature actually promulgated. Eschewing the judicial lawmaking that is the essence of common law, judges should interpret statutes and regulations by focusing on the text itself. Scalia then extends this principle to constitutional law.He proposes that we abandon the notion of an everchanging Constitution and pay attention to the Constitution's original meaning. Although not subscribing to the 'strict constructionism' that would prevent applying the Constitution to modern circumstances, Scalia emphatically rejects the idea that judges can properly 'smuggle' in new rights or deny old rights by using the Due Process Clause, for instance. In fact, such judicial discretion might lead to the destruction of the Bill of Rights if a majority of the judges ever wished to reach that most undesirable of goals. This essay is followed by four commentaries by Professors Gordon Wood, Laurence Tribe, Mary Ann Glendon, and Ronald Dworkin, who engage Justice Scalia's ideas about judicial interpretation from varying standpoints.

Szczegóły książki

Kategoria Książki po angielsku Law Jurisprudence & general issues Jurisprudence & philosophy of law

Ulubione w innej kategorii


250 000
zadowolonych klientów

Od roku 2008 obsłużyliśmy wielu miłośników książek, ale dla nas każdy był tym wyjątkowym.


Paczkomat 12,99 ZŁ 31975 punktów

Copyright! ©2008-24 libristo.pl Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżonePrywatnieCookies


Konto: Logowanie
Wszystkie książki świata w jednym miejscu. I co więcej w super cenach.

Koszyk ( pusty )

Kup za 299 zł i
zyskaj darmową dostawę.

Twoja lokalizacja: