Arab conquest of Egypt

The writing of the history of the Arab conquest of Egypt was not treated - by the author - as an incident disconnected from all other incidents of history, but rather as an incident whose danger does not appear and whose truth does not become clear unless it is compared to the major historical events that led the ancient Roman and Persian states to collide with the emerging Arab state. The just spirit that led the author to support the truth on the side of the Coptic nation also led him to support the truth on the side of the Arab nation, and he did not try to hide any of its virtues. Or he disturbed the clarity of her life during the period of the conquest of Egypt. Rather, he was fair in describing individuals and the group. This book has special value for another reason beyond what we have previously explained, and that is that the histories of the Arabs and their conquests have not yet been dealt with by a writer who confined his concern to a limited field and researched it extensively, as the author of this book did. We find many books describing the biography of the Arabs in general, and dealing with the conquest of Egypt in a brief statement of no more than dozens of pages. Most of these historians refer to what the Arabs wrote in their chronicles. However, this book in our hands only deals with the conquest of Egypt by the Arabs, and it is more than five hundred pages, and its author has returned to the chains of transmission of the Copts, Armenians, Syrians, Latins and others, and he has also returned to the writings of the Arabs, so his view was from more than one aspect, and for this reason we see it as closer to scrutiny. It is more likely that he achieved the intention.