The differences in usage of have/has to + V and must + V constructions in written English of the 1960s. A distinctive collexeme analysis / Libristo.pl
The differences in usage of have/has to + V and must + V constructions in written English of the 1960s. A distinctive collexeme analysis

Kod: 16106277

The differences in usage of have/has to + V and must + V constructions in written English of the 1960s. A distinctive collexeme analysis

Autor Hendrik Wonsak

Studienarbeit aus dem Jahr 2016 im Fachbereich Anglistik - Linguistik, Note: 2,3, Universität Hamburg, Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: Do I have to write this term paper or must I? Is there even a semantic difference between the two c ... więcej

175.60


Dostępna u dostawcy
Wysyłamy za 14 - 18 dni
Dodaj do schowka

Zobacz książki o podobnej tematyce

Podaruj tę książkę jeszcze dziś
  1. Zamów książkę i wybierz "Wyślij jako prezent".
  2. Natychmiast wyślemy Ci bon podarunkowy, który możesz przekazać adresatowi prezentu.
  3. Książka zostanie wysłana do adresata, a Ty o nic nie musisz się martwić.

Dowiedz się więcej

Więcej informacji o The differences in usage of have/has to + V and must + V constructions in written English of the 1960s. A distinctive collexeme analysis

Za ten zakup dostaniesz 102 punkty

Opis

Studienarbeit aus dem Jahr 2016 im Fachbereich Anglistik - Linguistik, Note: 2,3, Universität Hamburg, Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: Do I have to write this term paper or must I? Is there even a semantic difference between the two constructions have/has to + V and must + V? Epistemically, there is little diference between the two constructions, but a deontic approach shows that the construction must + V obliges the subject of the sentence to do something, while the construction have/has to + V does not play a strong deontic role. Nevertheless, native speakers of the English language use both constructions more or less indiscriminately. This term paper rejects the common approach that the two constructions are semantically identical, since certain verbs are more likely to occur in the have/has to + V-construction, than in the must + V-construction. According to Gries and Stefanowitsch, traditional linguistic studies view the lexicon and the grammar of a language as two completely diferent phenomena. In their cited publication, they state that "various expression types that fall somewhere in between lexicon and grammar have been recognized but largely ignored by mainstream syntactic theories" (Gries & Stefanowitsch, 2003, 209). Over the past decades, however, a variety of linguists, such as Lewis Hunston, Sinclair, Gries and Stefanowitsch themselves, have published a variety of theories, which approach a diferent view towards the connections between grammar and lexicon. These theories assume that "grammar and lexicon are not fundamentally diferent, and that the long-ignored multi-word expressions serve as an important link between them" (Gries & Stefanowitsch, 2003, 210). Following these theories, pairs of semantically more-or-less corresponding expressions and constructions, as the ones shown in (1) to (3), have occupied the attention of linguists all over the world (Gries & Stefanowitsch, 2004, 97): (1) Peter gave Mary the ball / Peter gave the ball to Mary (2) Frank is going to be happy / Frank will be happy (3) Peter must give Mary the ball / Peter has to give Mary the ball

Szczegóły książki

Kategoria Książki po niemiecku Geisteswissenschaften, Kunst, Musik Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft Allgemeine und Vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft

175.60

Ulubione w innej kategorii


250 000
zadowolonych klientów

Od roku 2008 obsłużyliśmy wielu miłośników książek, ale dla nas każdy był tym wyjątkowym.


Paczkomat 12,99 ZŁ 31975 punktów

Copyright! ©2008-24 libristo.pl Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżonePrywatnieCookies


Konto: Logowanie
Wszystkie książki świata w jednym miejscu. I co więcej w super cenach.

Koszyk ( pusty )

Kup za 299 zł i
zyskaj darmową dostawę.

Twoja lokalizacja: